User talk:SkyBlueCat
From Screamer Wiki
yes we can discuss and talk about Articles, but first, you need to learn how to use Talk page here.
About we-all-short.tk
Yo there, man! I reverted the edits you made on that article because there's no need to change the verbs to present tense when the article has the "Closed website" template on it. When you use present tense (such as "is a screamer website) you are pretty much implying it presently exists. That's why the past tense is used.
Also, it was a website of its own; a lot of other sites use the anne.png jumpscare. It doesn't really make them all mirrors of each other.
EDIT: and yeah, of course. Anything to help out. ^^ --Clener74 (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Hotel Mario 6
Hey there, Sky. I took a look at the article and edited it. Sure took me a bit of time, but I'm personally pretty good with how it came out. Feel free to check it. Cheers. --Clener74 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you :D :D --SkyBlueCat (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Just asking, what is the point behind editing clear, concise language with purple prose like that? It doesn't benefit the way the article reads at all. Hinders it, actually. --Clener74 (talk) 15:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Some edits are really strange.
Hey, mind if I ask why you edit articles solely to replace words with synonyms or metaphors that don't add any substance to the article? The grammar, spellings, etc. are left untouched, you just change random words for synonyms just for the sake of it. I don't understand. --Clener74 (talk) 02:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ok, ill fix it --SkyBlueCat (talk) 02:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm just wondering why there's a need to change anything at all. On one occasion you turned a quote from a game into an inaccurate one. Now you did the same thing but with a website's name. To me these edits just make the article less accurate or less readable in general. --Clener74 (talk) 02:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Can I be an admin?
I promise not to make any bad edits! :( I promise please let me be an admin. --Gordon03 Crisisim
if you're gonna be a good boy, please make the article look better, don't add "(no longer in the page)", do you know what im saying? --SkyBlueCat (talk) 05:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes, Understood
I won't make articles look bad. I got it -- Gordon Ramsay03 Criticism
Very bad impression.
I rewrote the Hotel Mario 6 article because you kindly asked me to, and after adding 2 lines of text and some images to an already complete article, you added it to your profile as "My Best Article". "Shady" doesn't begin to describe it. --Clener74 (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- aww Thank You! --SkyBlueCat (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, i was a bit too nice for everyone. --SkyBlueCat (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- No you're not, you're the one who made our wiki look good. Besides, you're just going to get a lot of positive reviews and you're going to do it anyway!!! --Screamer1234 (talk) 09:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- https://screamer.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:SkyBlueCat&diff=next&oldid=38731 - There really should be a rule against editing other people's messages to make yourself look good on your own talk page...look, Sky, I try my best to respect you as an administrator but you make it very hard, breaking the behavioral rules as stated in Screamer_Wiki:Administrators. There was no reason to edit his message the way you did; it just makes you look like an hypocrite. In any case, I'll use infoboxes when I consider it appropriate, though on particularly obscure ones (where there is not a shred of info available) I'll prefer to use just the image, as an infobox would look very empty. Also, there are pages that I think just look better with the image alone - it gives them more impact; I'll leave those be. Basically I'll keep infoboxes in mind but it's all down to choice for me. --Clener74 (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)