User talk:SkyBlueCat

From Screamer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

yes we can discuss and talk about Articles, but first, you need to learn how to use Talk page here.

About we-all-short.tk

Yo there, man! I reverted the edits you made on that article because there's no need to change the verbs to present tense when the article has the "Closed website" template on it. When you use present tense (such as "is a screamer website) you are pretty much implying it presently exists. That's why the past tense is used.

Also, it was a website of its own; a lot of other sites use the anne.png jumpscare. It doesn't really make them all mirrors of each other.

EDIT: and yeah, of course. Anything to help out. ^^ --Clener74 (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hotel Mario 6

Hey there, Sky. I took a look at the article and edited it. Sure took me a bit of time, but I'm personally pretty good with how it came out. Feel free to check it. Cheers. --Clener74 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you :D :D --SkyBlueCat (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Just asking, what is the point behind editing clear, concise language with purple prose like that? It doesn't benefit the way the article reads at all. Hinders it, actually. --Clener74 (talk) 15:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Some edits are really strange.

Hey, mind if I ask why you edit articles solely to replace words with synonyms or metaphors that don't add any substance to the article? The grammar, spellings, etc. are left untouched, you just change random words for synonyms just for the sake of it. I don't understand. --Clener74 (talk) 02:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

ok, ill fix it --SkyBlueCat (talk) 02:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm just wondering why there's a need to change anything at all. On one occasion you turned a quote from a game into an inaccurate one. Now you did the same thing but with a website's name. To me these edits just make the article less accurate or less readable in general. --Clener74 (talk) 02:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Can I be an admin?

I promise not to make any bad edits! :( I promise please let me be an admin. --Gordon03 Crisisim

if you're gonna be a good boy, please make the article look better, don't add "(no longer in the page)", do you know what im saying? --SkyBlueCat (talk) 05:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, Understood

I won't make articles look bad. I got it -- Gordon Ramsay03 Criticism

Very bad impression.

I rewrote the Hotel Mario 6 article because you kindly asked me to, and after adding 2 lines of text and some images to an already complete article, you added it to your profile as "My Best Article". "Shady" doesn't begin to describe it. --Clener74 (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

aww Thank You! --SkyBlueCat (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
You are supposedly an Administrator, why do you insist on displaying immature behavior? --Clener74 (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, i was a bit too nice for everyone. --SkyBlueCat (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
No you're not, you're the one who made our wiki look motherfucking shit. Besides, you're just going to get a lot of hate and you're not going to fucking do it anyway!!! --Screamer1234 (talk) 09:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
https://screamer.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:SkyBlueCat&diff=next&oldid=38731 - There really should be a rule against editing other people's messages to make yourself look good on your own talk page...look, Sky, I try my best to respect you as an administrator but you make it very hard, breaking the behavioral rules as stated in Screamer_Wiki:Administrators. There was no reason to edit his message the way you did; it just makes you look like an hypocrite. In any case, I'll use infoboxes when I consider it appropriate, though on particularly obscure ones (where there is not a shred of info available) I'll prefer to use just the image, as an infobox would look very empty. Also, there are pages that I think just look better with the image alone - it gives them more impact; I'll leave those be. Basically I'll keep infoboxes in mind but it's all down to choice for me. --Clener74 (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting my user page.

I appreciate it. --Clener74 (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem.

Wiki Screamer with Adobe Flash Player as screen

É parece que no começo do ano vai ser o fim, principalmente de vários jogos do Labirinto do Suto. Eu gostei da homenagem nesse Site ao plugin.

Translation:
It seems that at the beginning of the year will be the end, especially several games Scare Maze. I liked the tribute on this site to the plugin. Dragomaniaco (talk) 10:46, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

That tribute logo looks nice and neat, its gonna end in late December, the only reason why because they didn't even earn money, so they decided to close the plugin, which is scheduled in Jan 2020, R.I.P Flash games I've ever played in my childhood. --SkyBlueCat (talk) 10:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Can I have the abbility to delete comments?

  • Hi, may i plese have an abbility to delete comments, you know just in case.

--Gordon Ramsay03 Criticism (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Gordon Ramsay03 Criticism

Keep in mind, that I'm not a "crat" on this wiki, you should send a message to Lawiki1534 for permissions. --SkyBlueCat (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Can you stop calling me lazy?

I was just trying to improve your grammar in the articles by adding the Cleanup template. Plus, I'm trying to do it less often. ChillyBeanBAM (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Well my message I've sent to you was 7 months ago.

Explaining about moving to the deleted page

Isso na verdade foi a idéia do antigo burocrata quando Screamer Wikia era da Fandom, pois existia muitos videos screamers que era deletado pelo YouTube, mas não tinha mais acesso nem em web arquivo. Inicialmente eu tinha sugerido para deletar todos esses artigos de videos mortos, que apenas ocupava espaço aqui na Screamer Wikia, mas ele disse que era melhor mover o namespace para "deleted" esses artigos que não tinha mais videos. Note que todos os que estão no namespace "deleted:" não possui nenhum web arquivo salvo o video screamer, também nunca foram recarregados. Bem, eu espero ter explicado.

Translation:
This was actually the idea of the old bureaucrat when Screamer Wikia was from Fandom, as there were many video screamers that were deleted by YouTube, but no longer had access even in a web archive. Initially I had suggested to delete all of these dead video articles, which only occupied space here on the Screamer Wikia, but he said it was better to move the namespace to "deleted" those articles that no longer had videos. Note that everyone in the "deleted:" namespace does not have any web files except the video screamer, they have never been reloaded. Well, I hope I have explained. Dragomaniaco (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

And I'm sorry to answer now, is that I don't usually watch here, since there are very active Sysops like you to watch the wiki against these vandals and trolls. Dragomaniaco (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Well, that's a great idea to be honest, sorry for the late response. --SkyBlueCat (talk) 08:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

How do you make your images 4k?

--Gordon Ramsay03 Criticism (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)