Screamer Wiki talk:Rules/Illegal Content: Difference between revisions

From Screamer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
É proibido então links sobre loli e shota, certo? Pois bem, faz dois anos atrás aqui importou um artigo sock que, mostra um video mostrando cenas de sexo EXPLICITO com crianças (é uma animação loli e shota). Apesar que para mim esse artigo poderia até ser eliminado, não por ser contras as leis dos Estados Unidos (aqui no Brasil só é proibido imagens de crianças REAIS, Loli e Shota está mais numa lei cinza), mas é porque não parecia chocante o suficiente o artigo. Eu vou tentar pesquisar esse artigo por aqui.
É proibido então links sobre loli e shota, certo? Pois bem, faz dois anos atrás aqui importou um artigo sock que, mostra um video mostrando cenas de sexo EXPLICITO com crianças (é uma animação loli e shota). Apesar que para mim esse artigo poderia até ser eliminado, não por ser contras as leis dos Estados Unidos (aqui no Brasil só é proibido imagens de crianças REAIS, Loli e Shota está mais numa lei cinza), mas é porque não parecia chocante o suficiente o artigo. Eu vou tentar pesquisar esse artigo por aqui.


Translation:
Translation:<br>
So links about loli and shota are prohibited, right? Well, two years ago here I imported a sock article that shows a video showing EXPLICIT sex scenes with children (it's a loli and shota animation). Although for me this article could even be deleted, not because it is against US law (here in Brazil only images of REAL children are prohibited, Loli and Shota is more in a gray law), but it's because it didn't seem shocking enough the article. I'll try to search for that article here. [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 20:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
So links about loli and shota are prohibited, right? Well, two years ago here I imported a sock article that shows a video showing EXPLICIT sex scenes with children (it's a loli and shota animation). Although for me this article could even be deleted, not because it is against US law (here in Brazil only images of REAL children are prohibited, Loli and Shota is more in a gray law), but it's because it didn't seem shocking enough the article. I'll try to search for that article here. [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 20:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Worse than I can't find that article sock anymore, I believe the article is still here. It's a kind of parody of a Japanese clip to advertise a certain game, but this video had exaggerated sex scenes with girls and even had a shota. I never understood what was so shocking about this video. And if here really considers PROHIBITED links that show scenes, then you better help me look for this article, maybe it won't be deleted because it may be shocking to certain audiences, but the video link may be removed, due to American laws. Well, whoever likes slutty, go to Rule34! [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 19:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:39, 26 May 2023

What this means

Wouldn't this mean that Fukouna Shoujo 03 would also be prohibited? --Pmb1226 14:20, January 2022 (UTC)

É proibido então links sobre loli e shota, certo? Pois bem, faz dois anos atrás aqui importou um artigo sock que, mostra um video mostrando cenas de sexo EXPLICITO com crianças (é uma animação loli e shota). Apesar que para mim esse artigo poderia até ser eliminado, não por ser contras as leis dos Estados Unidos (aqui no Brasil só é proibido imagens de crianças REAIS, Loli e Shota está mais numa lei cinza), mas é porque não parecia chocante o suficiente o artigo. Eu vou tentar pesquisar esse artigo por aqui.

Translation:
So links about loli and shota are prohibited, right? Well, two years ago here I imported a sock article that shows a video showing EXPLICIT sex scenes with children (it's a loli and shota animation). Although for me this article could even be deleted, not because it is against US law (here in Brazil only images of REAL children are prohibited, Loli and Shota is more in a gray law), but it's because it didn't seem shocking enough the article. I'll try to search for that article here. Dragomaniaco (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Worse than I can't find that article sock anymore, I believe the article is still here. It's a kind of parody of a Japanese clip to advertise a certain game, but this video had exaggerated sex scenes with girls and even had a shota. I never understood what was so shocking about this video. And if here really considers PROHIBITED links that show scenes, then you better help me look for this article, maybe it won't be deleted because it may be shocking to certain audiences, but the video link may be removed, due to American laws. Well, whoever likes slutty, go to Rule34! Dragomaniaco (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)