Check users, Comment administrators, csmoderator, Interface administrators, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators
7,868
edits
Screamer1234 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Screamer1234 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Reception == | == Reception == | ||
=== Controversy === | === Controversy === | ||
The video had a positive reception from much of the media and people in support of curbing global warming. However, some supporters also believed that the video was too violent and that the shock tactic would not work properly.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/2010/oct/04/10-10-activism</ref> Climate skeptics, however, had an extremely negative reaction to the video; these people showed their negativity towards the video by calling Richard Curtis an Eco-fascist. The video also had a large dislike to like ratio with many of the top comments being from skeptics.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20101226060538/youtube.com/watch?v=sSTLDel-G9k</ref> Because of the | The video had a positive reception from much of the media and people in support of curbing global warming. However, some supporters also believed that the video was too violent and that the shock tactic would not work properly.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/2010/oct/04/10-10-activism</ref> Climate skeptics, however, had an extremely negative reaction to the video; these people showed their negativity towards the video by calling Richard Curtis an Eco-fascist. The video also had a large dislike to like ratio with many of the top comments being from skeptics.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20101226060538/youtube.com/watch?v=sSTLDel-G9k</ref> Because of the backlash, the video was private and removed from the 10:10 website.<ref>https://www.foxnews.com/science/school-children-blown-up-for-not-fighting-climate-change-in-controversial-ad</ref> | ||
== Links == | == Links == |
edits