Screamer Wiki talk:Rules/Illegal Content: Difference between revisions
(Is fukouna shoujo 03 illegal?) |
Dragomaniaco (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What this means== | ==What this means== | ||
Wouldn't this mean that [[Fukouna Shoujo 03]] would also be prohibited? --[[User:Pmb1226|Pmb1226]] 14:20, January 2022 (UTC) | Wouldn't this mean that [[Fukouna Shoujo 03]] would also be prohibited? --[[User:Pmb1226|Pmb1226]] 14:20, January 2022 (UTC) | ||
É proibido então links sobre loli e shota, certo? Pois bem, faz dois anos atrás aqui importou um artigo sock que, mostra um video mostrando cenas de sexo EXPLICITO com crianças (é uma animação loli e shota). Apesar que para mim esse artigo poderia até ser eliminado, não por ser contras as leis dos Estados Unidos (aqui no Brasil só é proibido imagens de crianças REAIS, Loli e Shota está mais numa lei cinza), mas é porque não parecia chocante o suficiente o artigo. Eu vou tentar pesquisar esse artigo por aqui. | |||
Translation: | |||
So links about loli and shota are prohibited, right? Well, two years ago here I imported a sock article that shows a video showing EXPLICIT sex scenes with children (it's a loli and shota animation). Although for me this article could even be deleted, not because it is against US law (here in Brazil only images of REAL children are prohibited, Loli and Shota is more in a gray law), but it's because it didn't seem shocking enough the article. I'll try to search for that article here. [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 20:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:24, 19 January 2022
What this means
Wouldn't this mean that Fukouna Shoujo 03 would also be prohibited? --Pmb1226 14:20, January 2022 (UTC)
É proibido então links sobre loli e shota, certo? Pois bem, faz dois anos atrás aqui importou um artigo sock que, mostra um video mostrando cenas de sexo EXPLICITO com crianças (é uma animação loli e shota). Apesar que para mim esse artigo poderia até ser eliminado, não por ser contras as leis dos Estados Unidos (aqui no Brasil só é proibido imagens de crianças REAIS, Loli e Shota está mais numa lei cinza), mas é porque não parecia chocante o suficiente o artigo. Eu vou tentar pesquisar esse artigo por aqui.
Translation: So links about loli and shota are prohibited, right? Well, two years ago here I imported a sock article that shows a video showing EXPLICIT sex scenes with children (it's a loli and shota animation). Although for me this article could even be deleted, not because it is against US law (here in Brazil only images of REAL children are prohibited, Loli and Shota is more in a gray law), but it's because it didn't seem shocking enough the article. I'll try to search for that article here. Dragomaniaco (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
