Talk:3 Orangutans 1 Blender: Difference between revisions
(Is this page worth keeping anymore?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== This article has been led astray. == | |||
When I edited almost the entirety of the article - 14:31, 22 February 2020 (revision is lost, not surprising given how many times it's been edited) - I did so because I had found a source of information that was at least moderately credible for a shock video. However, since then, the page has been edited so many times with details that were 'not' in the comment I had taken the information from; changes that only god knows where they came from. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all made up. | When I edited almost the entirety of the article - 14:31, 22 February 2020 (revision is lost, not surprising given how many times it's been edited) - I did so because I had found a source of information that was at least moderately credible for a shock video. However, since then, the page has been edited so many times with details that were 'not' in the comment I had taken the information from; changes that only god knows where they came from. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all made up. | ||
Revision as of 17:06, 18 December 2020
This article has been led astray.
When I edited almost the entirety of the article - 14:31, 22 February 2020 (revision is lost, not surprising given how many times it's been edited) - I did so because I had found a source of information that was at least moderately credible for a shock video. However, since then, the page has been edited so many times with details that were 'not' in the comment I had taken the information from; changes that only god knows where they came from. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all made up.
My point is, not only has this video been a potential hoax from the very beginning, but it went from a serious article on something that may or may not exist, to something that looks like it came straight out of Creepypasta Wiki. In other words, a hoax that was in turn fed with even more false details, turning into what it is now; a creepypasta with mangled grammar and structure.
To name an example, the body of the article has quotation marks as though these were literally Martinez' words, when I know that it's actually my own summarization of the comment, as the comment itself is a huge wall of text that would be a disservice to copy and paste onto the article unedited. Though that's a very small thing compared to all the extra details I noticed in these newer edits; these really make the video sound like the fiction it may actually be.
Since this article is no longer fulfilling its purpose of describing a potential shock video due to the abundance of unsourced information, I'm asking if it is eligible for deletion. --Clener74 (talk) 00:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
