Talk:3 Orangutans 1 Blender: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

== This article has been led astray. ==

When I edited almost the entirety of the article - 14:31, 22 February 2020 (revision is lost, not surprising given how many times it's been edited) - I did so because I had found a source of information that was at least moderately credible for a shock video. However, since then, the page has been edited so many times with details that were 'not' in the comment I had taken the information from; changes that only god knows where they came from. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all made up.

Line 6:

Line 7:

Since this article is no longer fulfilling its purpose of describing a potential shock video due to the abundance of unsourced information, I'm asking if it is eligible for deletion. --[[User:Clener74|Clener74]] ([[User talk:Clener74|talk]]) 00:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

no, the wiki has spiked again because of this, the view count is currently now 45,000 views, we could not delete this, since its may be the third thing that come up on the search results by searching up its name, so people will gonna enter here.

I see...so you'd be willing to trade principles for views. Well, I'm not the administrator of the wiki, so I suppose it's how it'll have to roll. To be fair, if that's the reasoning, then the false details that got added make sense. --[[User:Clener74|Clener74]] ([[User talk:Clener74|talk]]) 01:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== This article has been led astray. ==
 When I edited almost the entirety of the article - 14:31, 22 February 2020 (revision is lost, not surprising given how many times it's been edited) - I did so because I had found a source of information that was at least moderately credible for a shock video. However, since then, the page has been edited so many times with details that were 'not' in the comment I had taken the information from; changes that only god knows where they came from. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all made up.
@@ Line 6: / Line 7: @@
 Since this article is no longer fulfilling its purpose of describing a potential shock video due to the abundance of unsourced information, I'm asking if it is eligible for deletion. --[[User:Clener74|Clener74]] ([[User talk:Clener74|talk]]) 00:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
+no, the wiki has spiked again because of this, the view count is currently now 45,000 views, we could not delete this, since its may be the third thing that come up on the search results by searching up its name, so people will gonna enter here.
+I see...so you'd be willing to trade principles for views. Well, I'm not the administrator of the wiki, so I suppose it's how it'll have to roll. To be fair, if that's the reasoning, then the false details that got added make sense. --[[User:Clener74|Clener74]] ([[User talk:Clener74|talk]]) 01:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)