Both the Screamercord and this very wiki are currently listed as adult websites by AI classification models. We are currently working to remedy this, 2026 is not 2019.
In the meantime, you can help by moving all permalinks to IPFS
User talk:Hilarious Username: Difference between revisions
EverlongFF (talk | contribs) |
→Re:block/resignation message: new section |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit == | == RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit == | ||
There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST) | There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST) | ||
== Sad Satan == | |||
You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it's shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST) | |||
== Re:block/resignation message == | |||
[[user:Tankmanfan44]] I asked for a straight answer on why the pages were deleted. I didn’t get one. On any decent wiki you would at least need a sensible reason to delete something, and would probably have a system for discussing whether a page is in scope. But you don’t have that. You don’t have article talk pages. You don’t have internal discussion forums and noticeboards. You don’t even have a concrete notion of what the scope of this wiki ''is''. Your wiki lacks the most basic decision-making structures so you compensate by running it like an autocracy. You have rules, but you don’t follow them. You break your own admin conduct standards and basic civility expectations constantly. I expected I would be blocked. I edit warred because my pages were deleted without my input, without any good reason or explanation, and with no recourse, and I was just expected to sit with that because you were in charge and I wasn’t. I liked editing this wiki, but this experience ruined it for me. I sincerely hope you will at least take my advice and implement some basic wiki features like a deletion system that allows debate and user input, discussion forums that aren’t hosted off-wiki, and detailed scope guidelines that actually make sense. I also sincerely hope you’ll actually start following your own conduct standards— stop being so rude, and stop using your admin tools to shut people up when you can’t provide a decent explanation for your actions. If you actually make a wiki that’s worth editing and run in a sensible manner maybe I’ll come back, but for now I am retiring. --[[User:Hilarious Username|Hilarious Username]] ([[User talk:Hilarious Username|talk]]) 07:32, 10 March 2026 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:32, 10 March 2026
Welcome to Screamer Wiki
Where do I start?
- Preferences • Edit your preferences to adjust your comfort on the wiki.
- User talk:Hilarious Username/Edit • Edit your User Page to introduce yourself!
- Screamer Forums • The forums are a good place to go if you want to introduce yourself too! General updates are usually posted here too.
Eager to edit?
- Manual of Style • This page is very important, this is where you get to learn about creating Screamer Wiki pages.
- The Rules • These are also important, you should read these too!
- Help Guides • Need help with stuff? Go here.
- Stub Articles • These articles need some help, go edit them.
- FAQ • Frequently Asked Questions.
- Screamer Forums • The forums is a good place to go if you want to talk about something.
- Administrators • Need an admin? This page shows a list of all bureaucrats and administrators.
Check out our Social Media pages!
Welcome to Screamer Wiki!
Where do I start?
- Preferences • Edit your preferences to adjust your comfort on the wiki.
- User talk:Hilarious Username/Edit • Edit your User Page to introduce yourself!
- Screamer Forums • The forums are a good place to go if you want to introduce yourself too! Wiki updates are generally posted here too.
Eager to edit?
No worries! But please read these pages before editing!
- Manual of Style • This page is very important, this is where you get to learn about writing Articles on Screamer Wiki.
- The Rules • These are also important, you should read these too!
- Help Guides • Need help with stuff? Go here.
- Stub Articles • These articles need some help, go edit them.
- FAQ • Frequently Asked Questions
- Screamer Forums • The forums is a good place to go if you want to talk about something.
- Administrators • Need an admin? This page shows all administrators on the wiki.
1 guy 2 spoons edit
ok dude, i get with your point, I respect you as an editor, but there's no reason we could start an edit war like that. I wanted to quote-unquote the full snippet and a significant rumor because directing them to external links and without noting any detailed speculation or phenomenon is tasteless. Assuming you might think my edit makes the article out of place but we can talk about this respectfully. --EverlongFF (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2025 (MST)
RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit
There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --EverlongFF (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)
Sad Satan
You undeleted Sad Satan because you believe it's shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--ScreamerGuy2000 (talk) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)
Re:block/resignation message
user:Tankmanfan44 I asked for a straight answer on why the pages were deleted. I didn’t get one. On any decent wiki you would at least need a sensible reason to delete something, and would probably have a system for discussing whether a page is in scope. But you don’t have that. You don’t have article talk pages. You don’t have internal discussion forums and noticeboards. You don’t even have a concrete notion of what the scope of this wiki is. Your wiki lacks the most basic decision-making structures so you compensate by running it like an autocracy. You have rules, but you don’t follow them. You break your own admin conduct standards and basic civility expectations constantly. I expected I would be blocked. I edit warred because my pages were deleted without my input, without any good reason or explanation, and with no recourse, and I was just expected to sit with that because you were in charge and I wasn’t. I liked editing this wiki, but this experience ruined it for me. I sincerely hope you will at least take my advice and implement some basic wiki features like a deletion system that allows debate and user input, discussion forums that aren’t hosted off-wiki, and detailed scope guidelines that actually make sense. I also sincerely hope you’ll actually start following your own conduct standards— stop being so rude, and stop using your admin tools to shut people up when you can’t provide a decent explanation for your actions. If you actually make a wiki that’s worth editing and run in a sensible manner maybe I’ll come back, but for now I am retiring. --Hilarious Username (talk) 07:32, 10 March 2026 (MST)