Comment administrators, rollback
270
edits
User talk:Pmb1226: Difference between revisions
m
→Do you have this video?
mNo edit summary |
Dragomaniaco (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
:::https://i.redd.it/3z6n4ub8nlt61.png | :::https://i.redd.it/3z6n4ub8nlt61.png | ||
:::File:404NoGoatse.png --[[User:Pmb1226|Pmb1226]] ([[User talk:Pmb1226|talk]]) | :::File:404NoGoatse.png --[[User:Pmb1226|Pmb1226]] ([[User talk:Pmb1226|talk]]) | ||
== Do you have this video? == | |||
[[Ghost Footage]] | |||
The ''video.watchmask.com'' link doesn't work, do you have a saved copy of the screamer? --[[User:Tankman fan 44|Tankman fan 44]] ([[User talk:Tankman fan 44|talk]]) 15:01, 28 January 2023 (MST) | |||
:Can't find it anywhere --[[User:Pmb1226|Pmb1226]] ([[User talk:Pmb1226|talk]]) | |||
==Hello== | |||
I saw that you've been removing all the articles that start with "deleted:", well I do that because it was an idea of a bureaucrat here many years ago, when we were still in Fandom. The thing is, here it was turning into a GIANT TRASH of articles from videos deleted by YouTube, looking like someone just invented a fake video article. I initially wanted these screaming articles to be deleted from videos, where almost everything was done with the ass, being copy and paste, but which was deleted and never found again, so they gave me the idea of putting "deleted:" in those articles that still haven't been found. they had found a copy, or that they had saved it in the web archive, or something like that. That's why I put in that namespace, the articles that are videos, that were deleted and we don't even know if it will be restored one day or not. [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 17:42, 17 May 2023 (MST) | |||
