No edit summary |
|||
Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
What would that reason be? The original descriptions were far more detailed and far better at conveying the depravity of Britton's actions. What is the point of even having an article about this if it's going to be censored, as if you can sugar-coat something this evil?--[[User:MoonMetropolis|MoonMetropolis]] ([[User talk:MoonMetropolis|talk]]) 19:48, 21 December 2024 (MST) | What would that reason be? The original descriptions were far more detailed and far better at conveying the depravity of Britton's actions. What is the point of even having an article about this if it's going to be censored, as if you can sugar-coat something this evil?--[[User:MoonMetropolis|MoonMetropolis]] ([[User talk:MoonMetropolis|talk]]) 19:48, 21 December 2024 (MST) | ||
: [[User_talk:Gjlewis]] [[User:Lawiki|Lawiki]] ([[User talk:Lawiki|talk]]) 20:21, 21 December 2024 (MST) | : [[User_talk:Gjlewis]] [[User:Lawiki|Lawiki]] ([[User talk:Lawiki|talk]]) 20:21, 21 December 2024 (MST) | ||
::"The description is turning many people away from the page"? Uhhh, it's a page about the worst animal cruelty video known to exist. If people are traumatized from reading it, ''they should be''. This stuff absolutely should not be easy to read. Again, why even have an article about this if it's going to be censored and sugar-coated?--[[User:MoonMetropolis|MoonMetropolis]] ([[User talk:MoonMetropolis|talk]]) 20:32, 21 December 2024 (MST) |