confirmed
150
edits
User talk:Tankman fan 44: Difference between revisions
m
→Deletion of "Bowling animations"
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
:Although Twitter warns users about sensitive content, shock sites usually involve disturbing real-life material. Animated content, on the other hand, is a form of artistic expression, which sets it apart from real-life horrors typically associated with shock sites. --[[User:Tankman fan 44|<font color="#FFFFFF">'''Tankman fan 44'''</font>]] [[File:icon-user.gif|27px|link=User:Tankman fan 44]] 11:46, 26 August 2024 (MST) | :Although Twitter warns users about sensitive content, shock sites usually involve disturbing real-life material. Animated content, on the other hand, is a form of artistic expression, which sets it apart from real-life horrors typically associated with shock sites. --[[User:Tankman fan 44|<font color="#FFFFFF">'''Tankman fan 44'''</font>]] [[File:icon-user.gif|27px|link=User:Tankman fan 44]] 11:46, 26 August 2024 (MST) | ||
::I see, I thought these animations fit the category since animation is included in the Shock Sites definition, and the videos (especially the 2 most recent ones, but the 2 first ones too) were made with the intent to | ::I see, I thought these animations fit the category since animation is included in the Shock Sites definition, and the videos (especially the 2 most recent ones, but the 2 first ones too) were made with the intent to instigate a reaction, or replicate the reactions of horror/shock that the original 2 videos are known for. The huge spread of these videos around Twitter and even further, the potentially shocking "out of nowhere" twist to them and the fact that they appear on non 18+ user pages all make it count as a "shock site" to me, but I do respect your decision if you think otherwise. Once again, thanks for the help :D--[[User:Adonys|Adonys]] ([[User talk:Adonys|talk]]) 11:53, 26 August 2024 (MST) | ||
