Template talk:LegalNotice: Difference between revisions
From Screamer Wiki
No edit summary |
Dragomaniaco (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
this template should be in notice template category. Also, any article this template gets added to gets put in the "Template" category what going on? --Pmb1226 | this template should be in notice template category. Also, any article this template gets added to gets put in the "Template" category what going on? --Pmb1226 | ||
: Place the <nowiki>"<noinclude>" and "</noinclude>"</nowiki> tags around the category, and it shouldn't show up on the pages. [[User:Psycho|Psycho]] ([[User talk:Psycho|talk]]) 17:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | : Place the <nowiki>"<noinclude>" and "</noinclude>"</nowiki> tags around the category, and it shouldn't show up on the pages. [[User:Psycho|Psycho]] ([[User talk:Psycho|talk]]) 17:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
I understand what this template is for, but there is a small flaw in the text, if it says it is PROHIBITED to be published on the Site, it means that neither the article should exist. But whoever Sysop is here, I would suggest modifying the notice text to "The following content is illegal and therefore cannot be linked to that content on this site." So it's a way of saying that we will NOT even divulge the origin of this article, just quote it and at most post news to show that the sock site is REAL. [[User:Dragomaniaco|Dragomaniaco]] ([[User talk:Dragomaniaco|talk]]) 18:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:21, 4 January 2022
Please add notice category
this template should be in notice template category. Also, any article this template gets added to gets put in the "Template" category what going on? --Pmb1226
- Place the "<noinclude>" and "</noinclude>" tags around the category, and it shouldn't show up on the pages. Psycho (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I understand what this template is for, but there is a small flaw in the text, if it says it is PROHIBITED to be published on the Site, it means that neither the article should exist. But whoever Sysop is here, I would suggest modifying the notice text to "The following content is illegal and therefore cannot be linked to that content on this site." So it's a way of saying that we will NOT even divulge the origin of this article, just quote it and at most post news to show that the sock site is REAL. Dragomaniaco (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
